The European Organisation for Sustainability

Archive for September, 2014

What does post-monetaryism mean?

By Enrique Lescure

Introduction

Since 2008, the terms “post-monetary future” and “resource-based economy” have been floating around the web, appearing on comments to articles, youtube videos and blog entries. I am writing this entry partially to – as we say on Swedish – “bone out” what should be meant with post-monetaryism. I do not write this to define Energy Accounting as the only or ultimate formed of proposed post-monetaryism, but rather to create some broad basic definitions of what a post-monetary system, as opposed to a pre-monetary or monetary system could be defined, so a flexible agreement on the definitions can finally be reached.

I have meant to write this article for a long time, and the reason why is that I have observed on Facebook and on other places of the Internet a lot of individuals who are either putting forward new age and conspiracy-related proposals on how a post-monetary system would look like, or people who in the 00’s would have defined themselves as “anarcho-primitivists”/”green anarchists” and claim that we can establish a post-monetary system through gift economics, passive technology or “upgrading” to a hunter-gatherer society.

This post is not meant as a critique of anyone else than those individuals.

Pre-monetary systems

Pre-monetary systems have been the dominant systems for most of the existence of sedentary human civilization, and also dominated during the pre-civilizational era. Even until the 19th century, most of the economy of advanced civilizations such as Europe, China and the Middle East existed on a pre-monetary level – the farm, the village, the local town. Most people consumed what they produced, and could not trade their surplus because there was no surplus. Prior to industrialization, most people simply had to use most of their energy (in terms of their physical energy) to endure.

The local village economies were most often built on gifts, sharing or barter. We should note that most goods produced – tools, clothes, herbs, food – was goods that could easily be entirely assembled in their raw components and produced by one individual or a small group of individuals. The materials were most often collected from the immediate surroundings, and there was not much trade with the wider world.

Monetary systems

With arising cities, division of labour came into being. For comparative benefits, different trades started to arise 5000 years ago in the Fertile Crescent and the Nile Valley. This led to a gradual increase in the amount and number of goods, and thus to an increasing complexity in the systems. Since humans are adaptable, gradually one good, no matter if it was beer, salt or any form of metal (whatever there was more of than needed in the system) arose to become a sort of interim good for individuals to obtain what they desired. In 13th century Sweden for example, inter-county trade was conducted with salt as the dominant currency. Thus, even without money, currency regimes arose naturally.

Money as legal tender is a method of institutionalising a currency and centralising the control of the issuing, minting and/or printing, to secure the pre-dominance of institutions. Such institutions have often arisen a long time after the currency system in itself has been established.

The two characteristics of monetary systems, which can be summed up here, is that money allows for increased trade and for market economies to establish themselves, and that money allows the accumulation of wealth. This later aspect has led to a massive divergence in wealth between different social groups in most developed and developing nations. However, the establishment of national and international trade and national currency regimes can also be said to have contributed in a greatly positive manner in the matter of technological development and increasing access to water, housing, food and medication (though the increasing inequality also contributes vastly to destroying the conditions of life for perhaps a majority of the human population).

Eventually, monetary systems reaches a point in economic growth where human labour is increasingly replaced with automated labour, and where the exponential growth moves over a tipping point where the planetary eco-systems are starting to become exhausted. We are living at precisely this juncture in time at this point in 2014 CE.

Post-monetary theories

The truth is, there are probably countless theories floating around since at least the 19th century on how post-monetary systems could or should be arranged. Most of these proposals are stemming from convictions, opinions and aesthetic tastes amongst philosophers and pseudo-philosophers alike.

What I would like to offer is a definition of a post-monetary system which can – in a broad way – set it apart from a monetary system. The first marker is that a post-monetary system does not exclude accounting. On the contrary, it must rely on accounting.

Even the RBE concepts of Jacque Fresco must (theoretically) rely on a type of accounting. The main difference is not the non-existence of accounting or calculations, but the idea that these functions should be relegated to AI’s, which work within a cybernated planned economy. While some RBE followers will disagree on this, it shows more that they should read more about the theories which they are proselytizing.

As for myself, what I would like to offer to this discourse is a simple definition which can be read like this: A post-monetary system is an advanced system of economic calculation where the unit of exchange has transformed into a unit that cannot be accumulated over longer periods of time, and/or where other functions of the thing which we used to define as “money” has transformed beyond recognition. It is not moving back to barter or pre-monetary/pre-civilizational models. It exists within the context of a society that advances towards automation, and is based on the needs of such a society.

This definition is in my opinion more beautiful, broad and inclusive than either the both vague and sectarian RBE definitions, as it is including concepts from time-banking, ParEcon, RBE, to Energy Accounting and Labour Accounting. It also purposely excludes the New Age and Anarcho-primitivist definitions.

Post-Monetary

Stöd Biodomen i Lögdeå!

Som strukturen ser ut nu, Foto av Rickard Strandberg

Inledning

Ett av skälen till att denna blogg varit så tyst under det senaste året har varit att vi haft ett nära samarbete med Green Free Will, en grupp unga aktivister och studenter i Umeå med omnejd som planerar att skapa förutsättningar för hållbar produktion av jordbruksprodukter i norra Sverige.

Rent praktiskt innebär det första steget byggandet av en biosfär i form av en geodetisk dom, som när den är klar ska inhysa ett aquaponics-system och ett data-support-system för att kunna reglera inre förhållanden inne i domen, som temperatur, bakterie- och nitratnivåer, vattennivår och atmosfär.

Vi lyckades tillsammans med Green Free Will få tillstånd ett EU-stöd på 300.000 kr, som skulle gå till färdigställandet av domens exteriör. Detta skulle dock visa sig bli komplicerat…

Möt Alexander Bascom!

Varför behöver vi stöd?

Vårt beviljade stöd bygger på två delar. En förskottsbetalning, som vi använt som utlovat, och ett stöd som beviljas efter vi redovisat vårt tidigare stöd. Redovisningsdelen har dock visat sig kantad av svårigheter, då vi konstant skickar in våra underlag, och som svar får kompletteringar och nya redovisningskrav som vi inte informerats om sen tidigare. Detta blir problematiskt då det hotar domens färdigställande innan vår deadline. Ifall en sådan situation skulle infinna sig skulle vi bli återbetalningsskyldiga de 150.000 kr vi använt på material, lönekostnader, körningar och utfört arbete.

Vi måste alltså få domen färdig i år.

Hur mycket behöver vi.

Vi kommer behöva 60.000 kr för de innestående räkningar vi inte kunnat betala än och exteriören.

Vi har redan fått en del av detta stöd, i form av stöd från en mycket givmild privatperson. Dessa tusen kr kommer vi använda till att betala körkostnader för några av volontärerna som arbetat så hårt vid byggarbetsplatsen.

Ifall ni vill bli återbetalda så kan det anordnas genom att vi skriver utlägg på stödet, så att ni kan ersättas efter bygget är avklarat.

Hur stödjer jag er?

Du kan donera genom Paypal eller till vårt bankkontonummer.

Vår paypal-address är: andrew.wallace[at]technate.eu

Vårt bankkontonummer är: 8420-2 903 584 947-1 (Swedbank)

The future needs your help!

Enrique Lescure, Sekvensen för Relationer, EOS

Enrique Lescure, Sequence Director of Relations, EOS